<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Step Theory</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.classicalguitar.org/2009/08/step-theory/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.classicalguitar.org/2009/08/step-theory/</link>
	<description>Classical Guitar Lessons, Interview, News, Tips &#38; More</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 02:11:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Arney</title>
		<link>http://www.classicalguitar.org/2009/08/step-theory/#comment-2281</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Arney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 04:00:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.classicalguitarblog.net/?p=2005#comment-2281</guid>
		<description>Yes, I know exactly what you mean. However, instead of relating it to specific plateaus, I find my playing very much tends to &quot;rest on laurels&quot;-- the initial period of learning is fueled by obsession and lots of practice, as well as a paradigm shift. Once I gain some confidence, I tend to revert to the safety of the comfort zone I have created for myself. 

The solution I see to this is: (a) accept that I am not always able to notice progress in my playing, even when it is occuring; (b) list every category of my playing (repertoire, techniques, etc) and ask myself what I tend to over-play and what will be the most difficult and frustrating thing. For instance, I can sight-read single note melodies very comfortable in positions I - VI, but have a hard time in the upper positions because I haven&#039;t had as much discipline and have &quot;reverted&quot; to comfortable areas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I know exactly what you mean. However, instead of relating it to specific plateaus, I find my playing very much tends to &#8220;rest on laurels&#8221;&#8211; the initial period of learning is fueled by obsession and lots of practice, as well as a paradigm shift. Once I gain some confidence, I tend to revert to the safety of the comfort zone I have created for myself. </p>
<p>The solution I see to this is: (a) accept that I am not always able to notice progress in my playing, even when it is occuring; (b) list every category of my playing (repertoire, techniques, etc) and ask myself what I tend to over-play and what will be the most difficult and frustrating thing. For instance, I can sight-read single note melodies very comfortable in positions I &#8211; VI, but have a hard time in the upper positions because I haven&#8217;t had as much discipline and have &#8220;reverted&#8221; to comfortable areas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve C</title>
		<link>http://www.classicalguitar.org/2009/08/step-theory/#comment-1207</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 06:03:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.classicalguitarblog.net/?p=2005#comment-1207</guid>
		<description>Is that what I&#039;m in, a plateau? Yes riding the wave in the steep improvements I had as a beginner was easy. Now it seems like &quot;pushing sh*t up hill&quot;! (an Aussie saying). I&#039;m looking forward to that next random step.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is that what I&#8217;m in, a plateau? Yes riding the wave in the steep improvements I had as a beginner was easy. Now it seems like &#8220;pushing sh*t up hill&#8221;! (an Aussie saying). I&#8217;m looking forward to that next random step.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher Davis</title>
		<link>http://www.classicalguitar.org/2009/08/step-theory/#comment-1206</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Davis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 18:48:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.classicalguitarblog.net/?p=2005#comment-1206</guid>
		<description>Good points, Chuck. Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good points, Chuck. Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck</title>
		<link>http://www.classicalguitar.org/2009/08/step-theory/#comment-1205</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 18:07:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.classicalguitarblog.net/?p=2005#comment-1205</guid>
		<description>The music is enough, for sure, but if I didn&#039;t believe there was another step up somewhere in my future, I think I&#039;d get pretty frustrated.

I think the random nature of the steps acts as a reinforcement.  Studies show that consistent rewards are not as effective in modifying behavior as the random ones.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The music is enough, for sure, but if I didn&#8217;t believe there was another step up somewhere in my future, I think I&#8217;d get pretty frustrated.</p>
<p>I think the random nature of the steps acts as a reinforcement.  Studies show that consistent rewards are not as effective in modifying behavior as the random ones.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

